*decades

Reporter: [REDACTED]
Reason: Breaks Community Rules

In that people report on Russian media posts all the time, this isn’t remarkable. But the story is true, and the irony of it being about the latest new US propaganda organ isn’t lost one me.

Yeah, obviously Russia always knew better than to permanently occupy western Banderite concentrations. So Europe will inherit a nest of angry, armed fascists who feel betrayed. Good luck with that.

Peace? In this economy?

Remember what happened the last time Ukraine had a deal with the US?

It got couped, and not for the first time.

You framing the issues in terms of the CIA is dismissive of broader issues that these protest are taking on.

The article wasn’t about whatever grassroots grievances Mexicans may have; it was about astroturfing.

If you want to have a discussion about broader issues in Mexico then post about them.

This administration just loves jerking everyone’s chains.  
 
 
 
 
…Right guys?

You don’t understand: Gen-Z suddenly, organically, and globally had a collective epiphany. No NGO no NGO you’re the NGO.

Still the same strawman. No one said tgat every problem is caused by the CIA or that Mexico has no problems of its own, so why are you still arguing against a position that no one holds?

None of them have claimed such a thing. That’s just you putting words in their mouths and pretending to be their savior.

Does that mean we should dismiss grievances at their lack of transparency and accountability as the CIA because Morena happens to be in power

Again, no one dismissed anything, so why are you still shadowboxing this strawman?

It would be patronizing if we were actually telling them that.

The institutions in Mexico are very weak and Morena has not done that much to fortify them. They now have even more judicial and legislative power too. People feel the influence of cartels is still too strong and government accountability too low.

Why do you suppose the institutions are so weak or the cartels exist at all, never mind having significant power? You get that the CIA has largely been managing the global illegal drug trade for decades, right? Those cartels are there because the US wanted them there. The Iran-Contra affair wasn’t an aberration but a peek behind the curtain of the everyday activities of US empire.

Of course there are legitimate problems and real tensions. When the US wants regime change, it never starts from scratch. It always leverages whatever fissures already exist.

Capitalism and its contradictions 🤣

You’re also assuming I’m not being persecuted.

Big if true.

(a) Show me the Uyghur bodies

(b) Show me the serious bodily or mental harm

(c) Show me the conditions calculated to bring about physical destruction in whole or in part

(d) Show me the measures intended to prevent births within the group

In accordance with China’s affirmative action policies towards ethnic minorities, all non-Han ethnic groups were subject to different laws and were usually allowed to have two children in urban areas, and three or four in rural areas.

(e) Show me the forcible transfer of children from one group to another group

All you have are a couple of photos of prisons, which proves nothing, and some garbage testimonies that we’ve debunked a thousand fucking times already.

If the terrorism that the CIA-backed religious extremists brought down on Xinjiang happened in America, the US government would have come down on them a thousand times worse than how China handled them. This is obvious by simply looking at how the US handled 9/11, or by looking at US incarceration rates compared to China, or any other country in the world for that matter.

This was a failed attempt by the US government to balkanize/peel off Western China, and now the US is trying to make lemonade out of their lemon by accusing China of genocide.

No one seems to be interested in your Council on Foreign Relations hasbara.

I see, you’re speaking of genocide only in strictly a legal terms, as if that is the only meaning of the term “genocide.” Got it, Slippin’ Jimmy.

This is precisely why the US’s rhetoric is the way it is, because if they were honest about their mens rea then they would be legally complicit. The US pretends to be naïve to provide legal & rhetorical cover for itself.

Whether you are naïve, or only pretending to be, is an exercise for the reader.

“I took the White House’s rhetoric at its word and found it to be naïve, and therefore the United States is not complicit in genocide.”

Are you still removing comments refuting Western disinformation about Xinjiang for being “genocide denial”?

It’s never to late to develop real media literacy or to understand how the US incessantly prosecutes regime change operations globally, but I’m not holding my breath.