

ssn was never intended to be a form of identification. it was specifically decided that it would not be used as a form of identification by the administration that controlled it


ssn was never intended to be a form of identification. it was specifically decided that it would not be used as a form of identification by the administration that controlled it


i’m not voting for him if he was the last candidate on earth


all eyes on breen


the machine does not judge, the operator may, but that is not really a factor to many but is an abstract invasion. you can’t whisper your problems to the person sitting next to you without multiple companies trying to sell you a solution.
to someone in need an ai is an attractive option, this has no bearing on if that machine is qualified to do so. and while i get the urgency to move people over to any better option, shame is the quickest way to push someone to the end of the rope.
do not blame those who struggle. any port in a storm


i am sure shaming people who feel the need to open up about their feelings of suicide to an unjudging machine is a great idea. Totaly not a bad idea.
and what is going to happen is that some engineer will band aid the issue and all the ai crazy people will shout “see! it’s learnding!” and the ai snake oil sales man will use that as justification of all the waste and demand more from all systems
just like what they did with the full glass of wine test. and no ai fundamentally did not improve. the issue is fundamental with its design, not an issue of the data set