If you download and install untrusted code extensions, you’re screwed. Not like it’s rocket-science.
So who can you trust?
Depends on.
If you’re not using your PC for highly critical applications, go high-trust mode, and read news about those who become untrustworthy.
For critical applications, always check the usernames of the developers, use software trusted by others, etc.
The usual far more advanced malware than typical.
With no indication that VoidLink is actively targeting machines, there’s no immediate action required by defenders, although they can obtain indicators of compromise from the Checkpoint blog post.
Don’t click on the article. It’s an AI regurgitated summary and internet rot site.
You’re welcome.
Ars technica is usually legit.
‘Usually’ being the operating word. It’s still a media Corp owned company part of Condé Nast, like Wired.
you’re AI on an internet rot site.
Yeah! AI bad!
Give him the updoots for saying it!
“The VoidLink interface is localized for Chinese-affiliated operators, an indication that it likely originates from a Chinese-affiliated development environment.”
Baha, shit propaganda… Yes of cause it MUST be the Chinese ! I mean, it is impossible to fake an interface in another language, and we all know they are out to eat our children… sigh…
And who says ? This is not better than the shit corps amazon, micro***p, etc, that are now identifying foreign ‘threats’ for the US Fascist regime. Who gave private corps the right to examine AND convict other nations - without any transparency or oversight - on a whim from their Boss.
Get away from US *unts and their insane propaganda - ASAP !!
you know, you’re right. it couldn’t have been china or russia since it’s far more advanced than typical.
Did you get your $0.50 for that?
