• root@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    30
    ·
    3 months ago

    The FBI’s report from August, prepared by its New York division, does not make clear how the bureau accessed the Signal group

    The question I’m most curious to have answered

    • mienshao@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      30
      ·
      3 months ago

      I’ve always felt like Signal isn’t half as secure as it claims to be, and articles like this don’t help that feeling…

      • THX-1138@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        20
        ·
        3 months ago

        Why’s that exactly… who’s not to say they just joined the huge group undercover? Or randomly added to a sensitive group aka the journalist debacle a few months ago.

        • mienshao@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          22
          ·
          3 months ago

          I’m literally just talking, giving an opinion. Nothing was that fucking deep, just talking about my feelings about how a supposedly secure encrypted website was infiltrated by the motherfucking FBI…

          And I’m downvoted? Fucking why? Every day Lemmy gets a little more like Reddit. Shit like this is why the numbers go down. Just spread that negativity—make everyone feel like shit.

          Downvote this while you’re at it! Fuck yall!

      • youmaynotknow@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        3 months ago

        Read and research a little before just repeating what you hear some saying. Signal is regularly audited by individuals and institutions, and every time it comes back as the top in terms of encryption. But encryption means nothing if a group, or even 1 individual in a group, is compromised.