• thehatfox@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      29
      ·
      23 days ago

      For a lot of people most of their content isn’t even 1080p. Plenty of people watching DVDs and many TV channels only broadcast in SD.

      Display technology has long outpaced content delivery.

      • khannie@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        23 days ago

        Yeah, surprisingly DVD is still heavily outselling 4K bluray. Seems weird to me but I guess the players are ubiquitous.

        • b34k@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          23 days ago

          When 4K players cost $500 to get something considered “good but not great”… yeah no wonder no ones buying

          • khannie@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            22 days ago

            That is not what they cost. Mine was 180 euro. It has HDR support and plays everything I throw at it.

            • b34k@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              22 days ago

              HDR, or Dolby Vision? From my research, anything less than the Panasonic UB820 either has missing features, or longevity issues.

              Even still, 180 euro is well above the under $40 you can lots of DVD and even Standard Blu Ray

              Personally, I grabbed a MakeMKV compatible UHD optical drive from eBay for $150, and just remux my discs to Plex… and then use CoreELEC on the Ugoos AM6B+ to ensure proper Dolby Vision and Lossless Audio support…. but I know that’s not exactly a mainstream option.

      • PhoenixDog@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        23 days ago

        I still watch most streaming like YouTube and twitch on 720p because I really don’t see nor care about the difference to 1080p.

        • iLStrix@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          23 days ago

          It’s crazy how different people experience things. I find it annoying and less pleasant to watch YouTube at 1080p since they downgraded the bitrate and locked it behind premium. I actually almost always watch at 4k or 1440p60 even on a phone screen just because of the bitrate.

    • SkunkWorkz@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      23 days ago

      and a lot of movies aren’t even sharper in 4k. Since for a long time movies used a 2k intermediary format for post production, even if the movie was shot with a 4k camera.

      • b34k@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        23 days ago

        Early 2000s to mid 2010s movies shot digitally? Sure. Film shot movies, especially on 35mm or larger, absolutely look better in 4k. Especially when they’ve been restored from the negative and converted to HDR for a 4k release.

        There’s a lot of older movies out there where the UHD Blu Ray is the definitive version to own, looking significantly better than any prior version (and will likely never look better).

  • assembly@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    19
    ·
    23 days ago

    I’ve never seen an 8k TV but ignorance is bliss as I’m still rocking 1080 and happy. I do see the difference at 4k when at friends houses but 1080 still looks good in my living room.

    • Cethin@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      23 days ago

      2k is nice. 4k is pushing the limit of utility, even if you can get content for it (or play games with that resolution if gaming). 8k is beyond any need for any normal person. Maybe if you have a private movie studio you could use it, but I don’t think that’s what this is discussing.

      • Prox@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        23 days ago

        4k’s bump in resolution is nice, but the biggest benefit is the improvement in color (HDR or Dolby Vision).

    • olympicyes@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      23 days ago

      Even if they were priced the same as 4K they would still be a bad value. Computers and consoles struggle with 4K 120Hz so 4 times the resolution is too much to ask.

      • bitjunkie@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        22 days ago

        I wouldn’t dream of gaming on one at native res, idk if that was even a selling point but obviously something wasn’t working

  • pHr34kY@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    23 days ago

    It’s the next 3D.

    They try to expand in all dimensions. Bigger panels. Higher res. Higher bit depth. Increased contrast ratios. Stereoscopics. Higher refresh rates.

    Yet to find a real world use for anything over a 65" QHD at 60Hz 8bpp.

    • iopq@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      23 days ago

      It’s very different. 3D TVs actually had a difference in viewing experience

    • CallMeAnAI@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      23 days ago

      Look, you’re happy with a mid-range setup, good for you.

      But sticking your head in the sand pretending that there aren’t affordable features that improve the experience is Fedora wearing nerd shit.

      • pHr34kY@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        23 days ago

        The fedora-wearing nerds are ones with 244Hz ultrawide 4k HDR monitors.

        What you’re describing is everyone who just wants to watch a TV show comfortably on their sofa. You could swap any TV for a base-model TCL the same size and they won’t notice.

        Even the gamers won’t want 8K. You’d notice the drop on FPS more than the increase in quality.

  • CallMeAnAI@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    6
    ·
    23 days ago

    ITT: Poors acting like there is no in-between 720@59 and 8k@240.

    Guyuyyyzzzz achktually 1080p is all you need 🙄